absolutism in atheism, abuse of authority, acceptance, acknowledging your feelings, agnosticism, America, anger, anti-theism, argument, asking questions, assessment, assumptions about atheists, atheism, atheism movement, atheism philosphies, atheism plus, atheist representation, atheists bullying atheists, Belief, belief classifications, beliefs, Catholicism, Christopher Hitches, coexist, communication, complexity, conflating philosophy in atheism, conversations, Dennet, divisions within atheism, humanism, Lawrence Krauss, materialism, moral absolutism, narcissism in atheism, new atheism, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, secularism, theism
In the general public, there is an expectation when discussing the infighting amongst atheists, that there will never be a concrete movement away from God due to lack of cohesion. That because of atheists’ insistence on individualism and no clear rank and file, atheism in itself, is a flawed logic doomed to go out of style.
Obviously, the only flawed logic being applied is the assumption that atheism needs a concise rank and file, that it is necessary to form some type of dogmatic guideline in order to succeed. For the gazillionth time, the general public is trying to automatically tie some type of philosophy into atheism, and unfortunately, leaders in atheism are doing so too.
This is the very large error that is the detriment to the atheism movement. Individualism is necessary to being an atheist because the only requirement to be an atheist is a non belief in deities. Everything else that one decides to do as a result of not believing in gods has nothing to do with being an atheist. It has to do with that individual’s personal lifestyle choices.
But, the New Atheism and Atheism+ movements seek to tag on guidelines for being a proper atheist. And if you do not conform, you are ridiculed, ignored, or sometimes shunned. This type of behavior is very much puzzling to atheists around the globe, wondering why a difference of opinion on whether religion should be stamped out or permitted would preclude one from one form of atheism versus another. There is only one form of atheism!
The answer to that question was provided by Freud over a century ago. “A narcissism of small differences”. And that is what plagues the atheists of today.
Freud had coined this phrase after studying some earlier works of a British anthropologist by the name of Crawley. Freud recognized that there was a desire “to achieve a superficial sense of one’s own uniqueness, an ersatz sense of otherness which is only a mask for an underlying uniformity and sameness’.
The term appeared in one of his later books entitled Civilization and its Discontents, where it demonstrated the relation to the use of the inborn aggression in man to ethnic conflicts. It should be said that this is a process still considered by Freud, at that point, as ‘a convenient and relatively harmless satisfaction of the inclination to aggression’.
One would have to ask how harmless this satisfaction is in today’s age, where seemingly small differences are tantamount to the rise and fall of a politician’s career. Where a conflicting viewpoint entitles an individual to obscene amounts of negative backlash that remains available for public viewing until the internet evolves, yet again, into a different form of communication. Unlike the world of Freud’s Victorian atmosphere, we live in an age where all we have are small issues to argue over. Globally, priorities are very much aligned on the same page now, leaving us with smaller conflicts to pick at in order to keep pursuing the ever desired individualism our ego craves.
For those unfamiliar with narcissism, here is a very bare bones definition:
excessive or erotic interest in oneself and one’s physical appearance.
synonyms:“his emotional development was hindered by his mother’s narcissism” antonyms: modesty
Psychologyextreme selfishness, with a grandiose view of one’s own talents and a craving for admiration, as characterizing a personality type.
Psychoanalysisself-centeredness arising from failure to distinguish the self from external objects, either in very young babies or as a feature of mental disorder.